AI-assisted assignment review
Feedback your students can trust and act on .
Reviewer checks each submission against your rubric, quotes the evidence behind every comment, and keeps
instructors in control before anything reaches a student.
1
Student submits work Files or written answers, in versions.
2
AI reviews against the rubric Check scores, reasoning and cited evidence.
3
Instructor approves & releases Edit, approve or reject each item before release.
4
Student reads & asks Clear next steps, inspectable citations, open questions.
Built for trustworthy feedback
🎯
Criterion-referenced
Every comment maps to a rubric criterion, so students always know which skill it addresses.
📄
Evidence-grounded
Corrections cite the student's own words and the course materials — instructors check whether the evidence supports the judgement.
👩🏫
Human-supervised
Low-confidence items are routed to the instructor. Nothing is released without approval.
Two simple workflows
👩🏫 For instructors
1 Create a course and upload reference materials
2 Publish an assignment with rubric criteria and scoring rules
3 Review AI feedback — approve, edit or reject each item
4 Release to students and answer their follow-up questions
🎓 For students
1 Read the assignment brief, requirements and rubric
2 Submit your work — files or a written answer, in versions
3 Read released feedback with scores, reasons and evidence
4 Ask about any score that seems unclear or incorrect