AI-assisted assignment review

Feedback your students can trust and act on.

Reviewer checks each submission against your rubric, quotes the evidence behind every comment, and keeps instructors in control before anything reaches a student.

Built for trustworthy feedback

Criterion-referenced

Every comment maps to a rubric criterion, so students always know which skill it addresses.

Evidence-grounded

Corrections cite the student's own words and the course materials — instructors check whether the evidence supports the judgement.

Human-supervised

Low-confidence items are routed to the instructor. Nothing is released without approval.

Two simple workflows

👩‍🏫 For instructors

  1. 1Create a course and upload reference materials
  2. 2Publish an assignment with rubric criteria and scoring rules
  3. 3Review AI feedback — approve, edit or reject each item
  4. 4Release to students and answer their follow-up questions

🎓 For students

  1. 1Read the assignment brief, requirements and rubric
  2. 2Submit your work — files or a written answer, in versions
  3. 3Read released feedback with scores, reasons and evidence
  4. 4Ask about any score that seems unclear or incorrect